| Catalog Number |
RBYPOD8 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
07/17/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the internal iliac artery using pod8s.During the procedure, while advancing a pod8 through a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern), the physician experienced resistance at about 10cm from the lantern¿s distal tip; therefore, the pod8 was removed.Upon removal, the physician inspected the pod8 and attempted to advance it through the lantern again; however, the pod8 became stuck at the same position in the lantern.Therefore, the pod8 was removed and the procedure was completed using a new pod coil and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Results: the proximal pet lock was intact on the pusher assembly.The pod8 embolization coil was undamaged and intact with its pusher assembly.The pusher assembly¿s mid-joint was retracted proximal to the introducer sheaths friction lock.Dried blood was found inside the introducer sheath.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned pod8 revealed a device capable of advancing through its introducer sheath and a demonstration catheter.During functional testing, the pod8 was able to advance through its introducer sheath and demonstration catheter with minimal resistance after flushing coagulated blood from the introducer sheath.The lantern mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the root cause of the inability to advance the pod8 was not able to be determined.Based on the reported complaint, the pusher assembly mid-joint being retracted proximal to the introducer sheath friction lock likely happened after the device was removed from the patient or during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|