|
Follow-up #1 (b)(6) 2019: corrected data: -lot number for device.-street name contact office and manufacturing site.Added data: -expiration date for device.-device manufacture date.Additional incident information received: -on (b)(6) 2018, a user facility adverse event report was received from bfarm.It provided the following additional information regarding the incident (translated from german): "both camino probes show extreme differences of the icp in comparison to already existing measure." related device complaint number and mdr: (b)(4).Based on the incident information provided by the reporters as well as examination of the returned device, natus has completed its investigation.The investigation included: methods: -evaluation of actual device, -review of complaints history, -device history record review, -review of past capas/capa determination.Results: -the returned device showed evidence of use.The device was functionally tested and the catheter met performance criteria.-based on the complaint description, a review of complaints was performed using the following key words "integ-reading" in the search criteria.The review of catheter complaints from nov-2016 through nov-2018 found three (3) confirmed complaints during this time.-the dhr for the catheter was reviewed and no anomalies that could be associated with the complaint incident were observed.-a review of capas initiated within the past 24 months were reviewed to determine if any capas were generated specifically related to the customer's complaint.The review found zero (0) capas where the scope is related to this complaint incident.Based on incident rate and assessed risk captured in the risk management file, no capa initation required.The complaint was not confirmed and is now considered closed.
|