• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; ANNULOPLASTY RING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; ANNULOPLASTY RING Back to Search Results
Device Problems Structural Problem (2506); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Mitral Regurgitation (1964)
Event Date 07/20/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
There may be cases where a transcatheter valve is placed through a previously placed annuloplasty ring for recurrent regurgitation and/or stenosis.Annuloplasty rings are an adjunct to the valve repair and recurrent regurgitation and/or stenosis occurs as a result of progression of disease and is not related to a device malfunction.In this case, it was reported that the mitral ring was alleged to be failing, the device was not returned for evaluation, as it remained implanted.In this case, minimal information regarding this procedure was received and attempts to get additional information regarding the condition of the device, patient's medical history, or possible comorbidities have been unsuccessful.The root cause of the event remains indeterminable.If new information becomes available, a supplemental report will be submitted.The device history record (dhr) was not able to be reviewed as the device serial number was not provided.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that an unknown model mitral ring was disabled via a valve-in-ring procedure after unknown implant duration due to severe regurgitation.The mitral ring was alleged to be "failing".No additional details were provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the available information, the root cause of the event was likely due to patient related factors and the progression of the patient's underlying valvular disease pathology.
 
Event Description
Edwards received additional information through follow up with the healthcare provider.It was reported that an unknown model 30mm mitral ring was disabled via a valve-in-ring procedure after implant duration of approximately 10 years due to severe regurgitation.The mitral ring was alleged to be "failing".The patient had severe mitral regurgitation after deployment of the 1st 26 mm transcatheter valve, across the mitral ring, this valve was too atrial, and the native leaflets were prolapsing through the valve, and there was regurgitation.Therefore, a 2nd valve was placed, this time further into the ventricle, and now there was no paravalvular mitral regurgitation.The patient will be returned to the coronary intensive care unit in stable condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: f10, h6.Reference capa-20-00141.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
ANNULOPLASTY RING
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key7778530
MDR Text Key116955562
Report Number2015691-2018-03340
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/20/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/20/2018
Initial Date FDA Received08/13/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/15/2018
07/23/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/05/2018
12/07/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age20 YR
-
-