|
This report relates to report 9680654-2018-00023.The device was not returned for evaluation and remains in-situ.Images were provided and reviewed by william cook australia medical director: "the original endograft was implanted in early 2015 and a good 3-stent overlap was achieved, with the graft lying nice and straight inside the abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).A secondary procedure was performed in 2017 to add iliac leg extensions ¿ no history is available as to why this was done, but presumably due to type 1b endoleak(s) at the lower end(s) of the bifurcated graft.All of the overlap had been lost and the components separated.Also noteworthy is the marked anterior bowing of the graft compared to the straight position of the graft shortly after the initial procedure.When looking at the ct scan from 2017, it can be seen even then that there has been bowing of the graft, with loss of overlap down to 2 stents." work order ac944129 was reviewed and appears complete and correct.The device ifu states: "the long-term performance of fenestrated endovascular grafts, including the stents placed in fenestrations/scallops, has not yet been established.All patients should be advised that endovascular treatment requires life-long, regular follow-up to assess their health and the performance of their endovascular graft.Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysms, changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft, or stenosis/occlusion of vessels accommodated by fenestrations) should receive enhanced follow-up." "after endovascular graft placement, patients should be regularly monitored for perigraft flow, aneurysm growth, patency of vessels accommodated by a fenestration/scallop, or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft.At a minimum, annual imaging is recommended, including: 1) abdominal radiographs to examine device integrity (separation between components, stent fracture or barb separation) and 2) contrast and non-contrast ct to examine aneurysm changes, perigraft flow, patency, tortuosity and progressive disease.If renal complications or other factors preclude the use of image contrast media, abdominal radiographs and duplex ultrasound may provide similar information." "key anatomic elements that may affect successful exclusion of the aneurysm include severe proximal neck angulation (> 45 degrees for infrarenal neck to axis of aaa or > 45 degrees for suprarenal neck relative to the immediate infrarenal neck); short proximal aortic neck (<4 mm); greater than 10% increase in diameter over 15 mm of proximal aortic neck length; and circumferential thrombus and/or calcification at the arterial implantation sites, specifically the proximal aortic neck and distal iliac artery interface.Irregular calcification and/or plaque may compromise the fixation and sealing of the implantation sites.Necks exhibiting these key anatomic elements may be more conducive to graft migration" "potential adverse events that may occur and/or require intervention include, but are not limited to: endoleak, and endoprosthesis (improper component placement; incomplete component deployment; component migration; suture break; occlusion; infection; stent fracture; graft material wear; dilatation; erosion; puncture; perigraft flow; barb separation and corrosion)." based on the information provided, the root cause for the incident cannot be determined.It is possible that the separation was due to: - insufficient fixation (friction) between the proximal and distal components - inadequate retention forces - distal device separation - patient-related factors.The degree of anterior ¿bowing¿ of the graft seems to have increased between the initial procedure and the imaging of the recent hospital admission for ruptured aneurysm.
|