|
(b)(4).The complaint device was received and inspected.The anchor is broken near its distal end confirming this complaint.Visual observation of the broken anchor indicates the external geometry of the screw was not damaged as the threads did not strip during insertion.It was reported that the procedure was performed without tapping.Based on this information, the root cause of the break is misuse, as tapping is a required procedural step.A batch review was conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues, which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the mitek complaints system revealed one dissimilar complaint for this lot of (b)(4) devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.This report is being filed from the remetrex complaint management system as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|