|
It was reported the physician could not advance the nester platinum embolization coil during a tae procedure.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence during preliminary investigation, it was found that the coil had severe damage including an absence of curl shape, stretched, and unraveled.The weld ball was still intact on the distal end and the end coil appeared to be in good condition.
|
|
Correction: at the time of the initial report the following additional information was received but inadvertently not included in the initial mdr: it was reported the physician could not advance the nester platinum embolization coil due to the coil being completely lodged in the loading cartridge ((b)(6) 2018).At the time of the initial report, the customer also reported the ifu was followed.Additionally, the procedure at the time of the event was a transarterial embolization (tae).Additional information: the patient's pre-existing condition is hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc).Investigation ¿ evaluation: conclusion codes:4315 (cause not established).A review of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, specifications, and a visual inspection/dimensional verification of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was returned, and from the device failure analysis report, the coil was free from the cartridge when returned, with excess bio matter found on the coil and throughout the adapter.The coil had severe damage including an absence of curl shape, stretched, and unraveled.This returned condition contradicts what the customer stated when they said the coil was completely lodged in the loading cartridge and no force was used to remove it.It could be that another person at the facility removed the coil before returning the product.It is highly unlikely that during the returning process, the device completely fell out and become damaged.The weld ball was still intact on the distal end and the end coil appeared to be in good condition.There also appeared to be no damage on the loading cartridge or adapter.The product passed all specifications deemed necessary to evaluate.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Ifu states: "warnings: nester embolization coils are not recommended for use with polyurethane catheters or catheters with sideports.If a catheter with sideports is used, the embolus may lodge in the sideport or pass inadvertently through it.Use of a polyurethane catheter may also result in lodging of the embolus within the catheter.Precautions: prior to introduction of the embolization coil, flush the angiographic catheter with saline.If using a.018 inch micronester embolization coil, ensure that the delivery catheter has an internal diameter (id) between.018 and.025 inch.Instructions for use: 2.Firmly grasp the loading cartridge between thumb and forefinger.Introduce the metal end of the loading cartridge into the base of the catheter hub.Lock loading cartridge onto catheter hub by turning luer lock adapter clockwise.3.Maintaining position of the cartridge, advance the stiff portion of the wire guide into the loading cannula.Push the coil into the first 20 to 30 cm of the angiographic catheter.Remove the wire guide and loading cartridge.Note: if you are placing a.018 inch embolization coil, you will advance the coil into the first few centimeters of the angiographic catheter with the loading stylet that is provided with the coils.4.With the flexible tip of the wire guide, advance the embolization coil to the tip of the catheter.Verify position of the angiographic catheter prior to deployment.5.Deploy the coil by advancing the wire guide past the tip of the catheter." based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.We have notified the appropriate personnel and will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|