| Catalog Number |
DR80610 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
07/26/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No hospital/medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the proximal marker band of the pta balloon was allegedly located in the center of balloon after insertion into the patient.The pta balloon was exchanged over the guidewire for another that was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the proximal marker band of the pta balloon was allegedly located in the center of balloon after insertion into the patient.The pta balloon was exchanged over the guidewire for another that was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Investigation summary: the device was returned for evaluation.The device was inspected visually and under x-ray imaging and the distal marker band was found to be dislodged from the inner lumen.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported marker band issue.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.It is unknown if procedural issues contributed to the dislodgement of the distal marker band.Labeling review: the review of the ifu (instructions for use), indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|