• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C0415
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 07/26/2018
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly and had offset coil winds.The introducer sheath was not seated on the pusher assembly mid-joint and the sheath had an unknown harden substance inside.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed that embolization coil had offset coil winds.If the embolization coil is advanced against resistance, offset coil winds may result.The non-penumbra microcatheter was not returned for evaluation and the root cause of the initial resistance could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed an unknown harden substance inside the introducer sheath.During the functional test, the ruby coil could not be advanced or retracted within its introducer sheath due to an unknown hardened substance.The root cause of the unknown substance could not be determined.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastroduodenal artery (gda) using ruby coils.During the procedure, while attempting to advance a ruby coil through a non-penumbra microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance; therefore, it was removed.The physician then attempted to re-advance the ruby coil through the microcatheter but the same issue occurred; therefore, it was removed.The procedure was completed using another ruby coil and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key7811519
Report Number3005168196-2018-01668
Device Sequence Number2061012
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548012858
UDI-Public00814548012858
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateKS
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K120330
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 07/26/2018
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/16/2023
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C0415
Device Lot NumberF65346
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/02/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/26/2018
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/23/2018
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age52 YR
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-