|
The customer complained of discrepant elecsys cea assay results for 3 patient samples on a cobas e 411 immunoassay analyzer serial number (b)(4).For patient 1 the initial cea result was 36.2 ng/ml and the repeat result was 25.6 ng/ml on the e 411.The sample was sent to a different laboratory.The cea result was 63.5 ng/ml on the abbott architect instrument and was reported outside of the laboratory.On (b)(6) 2018, the customer changed the reagent pack and recalibrated.The sample was repeated and the cea results were 50.9 ng/ml and 50.7 ng/ml.For patient 2 on (b)(6) 2018, the initial cea result was 90 ng/ml and the repeat result was 70 ng/ml on the e 411.The cea result was 200 ng/ml in a different laboratory with the abbott architect.For patient 3 on (b)(6) 2018, the initial cea result was 89 ng/ml and the repeat result was 90 ng/ml on the e 411.The cea result was 400 ng/ml in a different laboratory with the abbott architect.No erroneous results were reported outside of the laboratory.There was no adverse event.The field service engineer(fse) ran a performance test that failed.The fse performed an adjustment and an initial cell blank.The calibration and qc were acceptable with new reagent.The initial investigation determined that prior to (b)(6) 2018 the customer was not using the recommended calibration frequency.The initial investigation determined that the qc was acceptable based on the provided qc data.Based on a review of worldwide data of qc recovery for the reagent/calibrator lot combination used by the customer, no reagent issue was found.
|