|
Patient¿s height reported as 5 feet 7 inches.Additional device product codes: hrs, ktt.Device broke during insertion; device not considered implanted/explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: the implant was received with the reported condition of ¿broken (2+ pieces) intraoperatively: rm.¿ the following investigation flow was performed: broken.It was visually observed that the screw shaft (not returned) has sheared off just below the screw head and before the screw threads start (returned).The complaint condition is confirmed and the received condition agrees with the complaint description.The cause of the issue could not be definitively traced to use error, misuse/abuse, non-compliance, postoperative trauma.Dimensional inspection: diameter just below screw head specification: ø 2.45 +/- 0.2 mm measured diameter: ø 2.36 mm; conforming device used: calipers ca592 because the lot number is unknown, a device history record (dhr) review could not be performed.A review of the current design drawing and the drawing revision at the time of manufacture was performed; no issues were identified.Based on the available information it is not possible to determine a definitive root cause for the complaint condition.It is possible that an excessive off-axis load was applied resulting in the complaint condition.A material review could not be performed because the lot number is unknown.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|