|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observation confirms the distal tip of the anchor is broken, but is held in place by suture.When observed under magnification, no structural anomalies were observed that could have contributed to this failure.Anchor breakages are typically associated with off axis insertion, levering during insertion, hard bone quality or using incorrect instrumentation for preparing bone hole.A batch review was conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues, which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch was processed without incident related to this complaint and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the mitek complaints system revealed one other complaint of any type for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.We cannot discern a root cause for this failure.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).This report is being filed from the etq complaint management system as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.
|
|
It was reported that during a procedure, one of the anchors was defective, it seems that the screw of the anchor was broken.No consequences to the patient, another like device was used.
|