| Catalog Number |
TEXP120RH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
08/10/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) caucasian female patient underwent a breast reconstruction primary with a artoura breast tissue expander 375cc and experienced deflation on the left tissue expander.The patient noticed the deflation.As a result, the patient had undergone removal and replacement with on (b)(6) 2018.The patient had fully recovered after the surgery.The patient was not hospitalized.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 11/28/18, it was reported to mentor that the device evaluation and investigation have been completed.Upon receipt by mentor, the device contained no fluid.Brown and black material were observed within the device.Brown material was observed on the shell surface.During visual examination, mentor product analysis lab observed the device appears intact.Leak testing was performed in accordance with mentor procedures, and one leak was found on the anterior view of the device.The leak was caused by a rent measuring less than 0.1 cm in length.Microscopic examination of the rent edges gave no indications as to its cause.No other anomalies were found.Mentor products are 100% visually inspected prior to release in addition to thorough in-process testing during several stages of the manufacturing process.Mentor product analysis lab concluded that the rent occurred sometime subsequent to the removal of the device from its protective packaging.The complaint of deflation was confirmed since a rent was found on the device.Nonetheless, a microscopic examination of the rent edges was performed, and it did not provide conclusive evidence of what could be the root cause.At this point it is not possible to determine the origin of the brown and black material observed.Mentor products are 100% visually inspected prior to release in addition to thorough in-process testing during several stages of the manufacturing process.Mentor product analysis lab concluded that the rents occurred sometime subsequent to the removal of the device from its protective packaging.The severity level for this complaint code was determined to be a s3, which is defined as: necessitates intrusive medical or surgical intervention.No corrective action is required since there is no evidence that the failures modes are related with manufacturing or product design.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2018, it was reported to mentor that the mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun, but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Note: the date of event was reported conservatively previously as (b)(6) 2018 because the event took place between 8/10/18 and 8/12/18.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|