• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HOLOGIC, INC APTIMA HPV SCREENING ASSAY; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HOLOGIC, INC APTIMA HPV SCREENING ASSAY; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 303069
Medical Device Problem Code Output Problem (3005)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Test Result (2695)
Date of Event 08/14/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
On (b)(6) 2018, the customer at labcorp's (b)(4) site reported ((b)(4)) three (3) failed runs on their tigris instrument, sn (b)(4).Technical service (ts) reviewed tigris logs and found two (2) aptima combo 2 (ac2) runs and 1 aptima trichomonas vaginalis (atv) run that had failed due to auto detect (ad) injection delays.Hologic recommended the customer replace auto detect bottle caps.The customer called in again on the 8-20-18 (00367099) reporting additional run failures on ac2 and atv.A field service engineer was requested to go into the laboratory and service the instrument.To further assess the issue, a hologic product applications specialist (pas) reviewed tigris logs (sn (b)(4)) from 08/07/2018 - 08/20/2018 for all assay run on that tigris system.From that review, it was determined that a subset of samples from the customer's aptima hpv assay runs may have also been affected by the auto detect delay in injection.Hologic notified the customer and advised the customer to retest the samples.On 9-4-2018, hologic field application specialist (fas) spoke with the hpv manager at the (b)(4) laboratory who confirmed that the laboratory re-ran the samples and the corrected results were sent to physicians.There were no incorrect results associated with ac2 or atv samples, as these assays were invalidated due to errors caused by the injection delay.However, the ad injection delay likely resulted in false positive results in the aptima hpv assay which were reported to the respective physicians.The severity associated with a false positive result using the aptima hpv assay is [?]serious'.To mitigate this risk, hologic requested the customer to retest the samples in question; the customer retested the samples and made the necessary corrected reports.Hologic sent in a field service engineer to confirm the instrument is performing as expected and that there were no further injection delay issues.Further investigation into this issue is ongoing.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Final investigation results: hologic performed an investigation to determine the root cause for the potential false positive hpv results using the aptima hpv assay.Briefly, the investigation concluded that the potential false positive hpv results were caused by air bubbles that entered the auto detect injection line prior to when the tigris processed the first sample of an mtu.The aptima hpv assay produces two different rlu signal types: 1) the internal control-specific amplicon, which is detected using a probe with a rapid emission of light (flasher) and 2) the hpv specific amplicon, which is detected using probes with relatively slower kinetics of light emission (glower).An air bubble would delay the auto detect reagents from reaching the sample tube when the instrument luminometer initiates rlu reads.This delay in rlu response shifted the internal control-specific flasher signal to appear in the glower signal range, potentially producing a low positive hpv result.Generally, air bubbles in the lines are apparent based on the calibrators and controls invalidating assay runs.Therefore, if a customer contacts hologic, the risk of reporting potential false positive hpv results by that particular customer may be mitigated.A field service engineer was sent to the site and either cleaned or replaced the auto detect 2 syringe, which eliminated the air bubble forming in the injection lines.Per risk assessment, the severity associated with a false positive result using the aptima hpv assay is serious.To mitigate this risk, hologic requested the customer to retest the samples in question; the customer retested the samples and made the necessary corrected reports additionally, the frequency of an air bubble causing incorrect results is remote occurrence.
 
Event or Problem Description
This is the final report for 2024800-2018-00008 with investigation results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APTIMA HPV SCREENING ASSAY
Common Device Name
IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
HOLOGIC, INC
10210 genetic center dr
san diego CA 92121
MDR Report Key7864644
Report Number2024800-2018-00008
Device Sequence Number1911516
Product Code OYB
UDI-Device Identifier15420045500051
UDI-Public15420045500051
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P100042
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source health professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/13/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device No Information
Device Catalogue Number303069
Device Lot Number239642, 240090
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/14/2018
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/14/2018
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/11/2018
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/13/2019
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
-
-