Occupation: non healthcare professional.(b)(4).Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved determined the cutting wire securing component located near the distal end of the sphincterotome has disconnected from the catheter.The condition of the device prohibited a functional test of the used device because the cutting wire securing component located near the distal end of the sphincterotome disconnected from the catheter.The cutting wire is intact and remains securely attached to the sphincterotome at the proximal end.However, due to the catheter and securing component disconnection, the distal end of the cutting wire is no longer connected to the sphincterotome catheter.A section of the cutting wire securing component has broken and detached from the device.The broken section is estimated to be 3 mm in length and 0.5 mm in diameter.The broken section was not included in the return.The cutting wire shows evidence of cautery application.A product discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to this reported occurrence was not observed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined because the condition of the product said to be involved prohibited a complete evaluation.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported observation was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.Separation of the cutting wire securing component and the catheter can occur if the tip of the sphincterotome is over flexed.The instructions for use caution the user: "do not over flex or bow tip beyond 90 degrees, as this may damage or cause cutting wire to break." if the elevator of the endoscope remains in the closed/up position when retraction of the sphincterotome is attempted and additional pressure is applied, this can contribute to separation of the catheter and cutting wire securing component.The instructions for use caution the user: "elevator should remain open/down when advancing or retracting sphincterotome." this activity will aid in device preservation.Other factors that can contribute to separation of the cutting wire securing component and the catheter include manipulating the handle with the catheter in a coiled position or with the precurved stylet inside the cannulating tip.The instructions for use advise the user: "upon removing device from package, uncoil and straighten sphincterotome." the user is then instructed: "carefully remove precurved stylet from cannulating tip." the instructions for use contain the following comment: "note: do not exercise handle while device is coiled or precurved stylet is in place, as this may cause damage to the sphincterotome and render it inoperable." prior to distribution, all d.A.S.H.Dometip double lumen sphincterotomes are subjected to a visual inspection and functional test to ensure device integrity.The functional test includes bowing the sphincterotome to ensure the distal end responds to handle manipulation.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp), the physician used a cook d.A.S.H.Dometip double lumen sphincterotome.The device was advanced to desired position and the user pulled [bowed] the cutting wire, but the head of the cutting wire broke.The user changed to another same device to finish the procedure with no issue.There was no reportable information at this time.The device was returned on 20-aug-2018.The investigation determined that the cutting wire securing component had separated.Our evaluation of the returned device determined that approximately 3 mm of the securing component is missing and was not included in the return of the device.This information was communicated to the user facility and the location of the missing section is unknown.The initial reporter stated that a section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body; however the location of the missing section detected during our laboratory evaluation is unknown.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|