During a pediatric retrospective cohort study comparing antibiotic impregnated and traditional catheters, four spectrum turbo-ject double lumen catheters were placed into pediatric patients with an increased risk of venous catheter related infections.At an unknown time during the study, it was discovered that one patient had developed a catheter related infection.This infection was later classified as candida parapsilosis.
|
During a pediatric retrospective cohort study comparing antibiotic impregnated and traditional catheters, four spectrum turbo-ject double lumen catheters were placed into pediatric patients with an increased risk of venous catheter related infections.At an unknown time during the study, it was discovered that one patient had developed a catheter related infection.This infection was later classified as candida parapsilosis.
|
Investigation - evaluation: a review of the instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions and quality control of the device was conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.The proper procedures are in place to identify and prevent this failure mode prior to device distribution.The instructions for use (ifu) note that prior to insertion, the catheter shaft should not be wiped or immersed in ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, or other alcohols, acetone or other non-polar solvents.These solvents may remove the antimicrobial from the catheter and reduce the catheter¿s microbial efficacy.A review of the device history record could not be performed as the lot information is unknown.Based on the information provided, no returned product and the results of our investigation, a definitive cause could not be determined.Only one device out of four placed catheters of the same type developed the infection prior to removal, which suggests that it was not a device manufacturing issue.Infection is also a known inherent risk with the product.The most probable cause of this failure was due to unknown effects from patient anatomy.It is possible that the progression of a disease or infection occurred, which was unrelated to the device itself.The appropriate personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|