| Model Number |
279718101 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).A complaint investigation will be performed.The complaint product is not available for the investigation.A supplemental report is not anticipated unless the results of the complaint investigation identify a corrective action or additional relevant information.Should the product become available, a physical evaluation will be conducted and a supplemental report filed with the results.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was a revision surgery with previous expedium 6.35 s2 alar iliac screws in place.We took out a 9x100 screw and the doctor decided to upsize to a 10x100 closed head exp 6.35 screw.The doctor placed the screw initially without problem, but later decided he wanted to advance the screw a couple more rotations.During this step, we broke 3 different exp 6.35 screwdrivers, 2 of the t27 snapped off and the other driver had the connection threads snap off.The surgeon decided to leave the screw as is after the 3rd driver broke.Patient consequence? :no.Is the information being submitted for this complaint all the details that are known/available regarding this event? : yes.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Udi: (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.All complaint trends will be evaluated as a part of the depuy spine monthly complaint review meeting.Without the return of the device, we are unable to confirm the reported issue or identify the root cause.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer and no systemic trends were found, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.Should more information and/or the sample be provided at a later time, this complaint will be reopened and device evaluated.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Udi: (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Visual examination of the returned device revealed that the hex lobes on the poly driver¿s distal tip had become stripped.Noted damage indicated that the stripping occurred in the direction of tightening.It was also noted that the threads on the screwdriver sleeve had torn off.Observed damage suggests that its matting part was likely not properly seated and inadvertently cross threading occurred, resulting in the threads becoming torn.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.All complaint trends will be evaluated as a part of the depuy spine monthly complaint review meeting.A definitive root cause for the driver¿s distal tip becoming stripped cannot be positively determined.However, noted damage suggests that the driver that was likely subjected to the unanticipated torsional forces during the tightening process, resulting in the distal tip of the driver becoming stripped.A definitive root cause for the threads on the screwdriver sleeve becoming torn cannot be positively determined.However, the observed damage suggests that its matting part was likely not properly seated and inadvertently cross threading occurred, resulting in the threads becoming torn.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer and no systemic trends were found, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|