|
There was no known reported patient involvement associated with the complained event.Date of event: unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).Subject device has been received; no conclusions could be drawn as the device is entering the complaint system.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A review of the device history records has been requested and is currently pending completion.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Device evaluated by mfr: part: 312.020; lot: 2504449; manufacturing site: bettlach; release to warehouse date: july 21, 2009.The device history record shows this lot was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition.Customer quality investigation: investigation flow: damage-visual appearance not as expected: device condition: visual inspection performed at customer quality (cq) identified deformed tip on the returned trocar, which is consistent with the given complaint condition.The tip was found elongated with few nicks and dents around the tip forming surfaces.No new issues were identified.The given complaint condition agrees with the returned device condition and therefore the complaint was confirmed.Dimensional analysis and document/specification review: relevant drawings for the returned instrument were reviewed (both from the time of manufacture and present revision) were reviewed and no design issues were identified.Top level drawing for trocar; trocar shaft drawing.Dimensional analysis was not performed at the deformed tip portion due to significant post manufacture damage.Device history record showed that this lot was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.The lot met all dimensional, visual and functional criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process and therefore no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition were noted.A definitive root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.However, the failure mode is typically associated with the application of excessive force on the tip during usage.Conclusion: the overall complaint condition was confirmed; however, no product design issues or manufacturing discrepancies were identified during this investigation.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|