|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. EMP 13 STEM PRIMARY HO; PRSTHSIS,HIP,SMI-CNSTRND,UNCMNTD,MTAL/PLYMR,NON-PORS,CALICUM-PHSPHTE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
71291302 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Reaction, Injection Site (2442)
|
| Date of Event |
07/20/2011
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2011 a medical intervention was performed due to pain.A steroid injection was performed to treat severe pain the patient was presenting.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The associated complaint devices was returned and evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A lab analysis indicated that the sleeve exhibits bone on/ingrowth on the medial side; the amount suggests the cone was well fixed prior to removal.The sleeve was well fixed is the missing porous coating on the proximal lateral area of the sleeve as this was likely the result of instrument contact.A potential fracture initiation site is visible at the lateral mating edge of the sleeve and stem component.A piece of the stem below the lower calcar platform was returned.An sem examination of the fracture surface of this piece supports the earlier observation of the potential crack initiation site being at the lateral mating surface of the sleeve and stem.Edxs analysis within the fracture site did not find any foreign or unexpected constituents in the material.The fracture surface reveals characteristics consistent with a fatigue fracture.A clinical analysis indicated that based on the available information, the root cause of the first revision was the broken stem that resulted from the stated fall.The clinical symptoms of the reported of "hip pain" and osteolysis of the greater trochanter may be consistent with an adverse reaction to metal debris but this cannot be confirmed based on the information provided as well this could also be lack of support around the proximal stem due to stress shielding.The root cause for the second revision due to "loosening" just 8 months later cannot be concluded.However, it is unknown if the use of third party components added to the issue of "loosening".No current information or patient history has been provided for this assessment.Should information become available this complaint can be re-assessed.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|