The review of the device history record showed no deviations.All product features corresponded with the valid specifications of the waldemar link gmbh & co.Kg at the time, when the item was produced.The t-piece, the bearing shells, the tibia component and the polyethylene plateau were available for the visual examination.The bushing was not provided.The service life was approximately 2 years and 9 months.The x-rays show a non-parallel joint line, which indicates a socket damage.It is assumed that an insufficiently stable soft tissue situation caused by multiple prosthesis changes at an unknown activity level of the patient led to functional and mechanical overloading or overstretching of the coupling mechanism and thus to socket damage of the implant.The patient's bmi is 34.According to our instructions for use, obesity is a relative contraindication.The final cause of the socket damage could not be determined because the socket was not available.The examination of the received complaint samples did not reveal any indications of a material or manufacturing defect causing the damage.A damage pattern as in the present case is known from damage cases after functional overload.Ultimately, the final decision for an implant must be made by the surgeon based on his individual analysis and experience for each patient.The studies by e.Nieder [2] and e.Nieder [2], among others, provide assistance in this respect.Katzer [1] provide information.The waldemar link gmbh & co.Kg is aiming for the highest product quality and trying to keep the failure rate as low as possible by means of the customer feedback.Permanent employee trainings and market surveillance are performed.[translation].
|