A review of the device history records indicates that the reported devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.The complaint history review indicated that there were no similar events for the reported lot.Visual inspection by manufacturing engineer, "after reviewing the blister, there is no obvious evidence that the blister package was improperly sealed.Specifically, no sign of over-sealing (translucent seals, warped flanges) were observed that may lead to delamination.The dhr (router) was also reviewed for the lot in question and no discrepancies were noted.There are also no other obvious input sources from production which could contribute to the delamination on the interior of the outer tyvek.".
|