• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTHXSFT0208
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/17/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly, stuck inside the proximal end of its introducer sheath, and had offset coil winds.The smart coil embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly and, therefore, the smart coil could not be functionally tested.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned smart coil revealed that the embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly.If the device is forcefully retracted against resistance, damage such as the embolization coil detaching may occur.Further evaluation revealed that the embolization coil winds were offset on the proximal end of the embolization coil inside the sheath.These offset coil wind may have contributed to the resistance prior to the embolization coil detaching from its pusher assembly and prevented the smart coil from advancing out of its sheath during the procedure.The non-penumbra microcatheter identified in the complaint was not returned to penumbra for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat multiple aortopulmonary collateral arteries (mapcas) using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, the physician deployed and detached seven smart coils and seven pc400s in the target vessel using a non-penumbra microcatheter.The physician then connected the introducer sheath of another smart coil to the hub of the microcatheter and attempted to advance the smart coil into the hub of the microcatheter; however, the smart coil became stuck and would not advance out of its introducer sheath.Therefore, it was removed.The physician then attempted to pull the smart coil out of its introducer sheath and insert it into another introducer sheath; however, the smart coil detached from its pusher assembly.The procedure was completed using five additional smart coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7894299
MDR Text Key120969435
Report Number3005168196-2018-01869
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548015996
UDI-Public00814548015996
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,08/21/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/20/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/23/2022
Device Catalogue Number400SMTHXSFT0208
Device Lot NumberF78839
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/12/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received08/21/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age1 YR
-
-