| Catalog Number |
02.12.T3I4L |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
08/31/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Batch review performed on 18 september 2018; lot 179634: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 20 march 2018.Expiration date: 2023-03-08; no anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been already sold without any similar reported event.Clinical evaluation performed by medical affairs (b)(4) on 21 september 2018; tibial component revision surgery occurred 3 months after primary cemented total knee arthroplasty in a (b)(6) year old woman.Tibial baseplate looks anteriorly subsided and radiolucent lines at the implant-cement interface are visible in the x-rays provided.Such an early and extensive failure of tibial bone support is very rare and hardly understandable.The implant looks perfectly positioned after index surgery.There is no comment in the report about traumatic events or possibilities of infection.However, this is a failure of bone support, and therefore there is no reason to suspect a faulty device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
We were informed on 23 august 2018 that a revision surgery is necessary due to suspicion loosening tibial plateau.The revision performed on (b)(6) 2018.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Visual inspection performed by r&d product manager on (b)(6) 2018: revision surgery after 3 months year from primary implantation for loosening of the tibial component.Visual inspection of the returned tibia tray and tibial insert.No traces of residual cement can be seen on the distal surface of the explanted tibial baseplate.This is something usual to be seen on explanted components even if the cause of revision is not instability, loosening or mobilization.Therefore, lack of cement on the distal surface is not an evidence of lack of adhesion between the cement and the implant.Furthermore, surface finishing of the implant seems to be in compliance with specifications required.Loosening could be linked to several factors that are not implant related, such as failure of cement or of the cementation process.Also the fall of the patient could have played a role, but this event has not been confirmed yet.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|