| Model Number |
EL-252013H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date of event is unknown.Date of implantation is unknown.Device has not been explanted.Device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Initial reporter address and telephone not available for reporting.Device evaluation/investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn as product was not returned to manufacturer.Additionally, device history records review could not be completed without lot number.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on an unknown date, patient had a follow-up and surgeon noticed a broken elite compression implant in talonavicular (tn) joint based on an x-ray review.It is unknown when the device was originally implanted.Patient had no complaints of pain or any symptoms.There was no revision procedure performed.This report is for one (1) elite compression implant 25x20x20x20x20 4 legs.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device evaluation: investigation type: x-ray review.The device was not received for evaluation.The provided medical images were reviewed at bme with the following results.¿investigation was performed based on x-rays provided in the attached file ((b)(4) xray image (b)(6) 2018).The x-rays show one broken elite h staple (el-202013h).The staple is implanted on the tn joint and has one broken leg at the shoulder.A dhr review on this implant could not be performed as the lot number was not provided.A relevant drawing for the device was reviewed during the investigation (the drawing at the time of manufacture is current), elite-h series post tumbling inspection.During the investigation no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Device was not returned to customer quality (cq) for device evaluation, therefore, material assessment or dimensional inspection could not be performed.¿ conclusion: in conclusion, the complaint condition is confirmed as a broken elite h staple was observed in the provided medical images.During the investigation no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.No new malfunctions were observed during the course of this investigation.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This report is for one (1) elite compression implant 20x20x20x20x20 4 legs.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Investigation summary: background: it was reported that on an unknown date, patient had a follow-up and surgeon noticed a broken elite compression implant in talonavicular (tn) joint based on an x-ray review.It is unknown when the device was originally implanted.Patient had no complaints of pain or any symptoms.There was no revision procedure performed.Device evaluation: investigation type: x-ray review.The device was not received for evaluation.The provided medical images were reviewed at bme with the following results.Investigation was performed based on x-rays provided.The x-rays show one broken elite h staple (el-202013h).The staple is implanted on the tn joint and has one broken leg at the shoulder.A dhr review on this implant could not be performed as the lot number was not provided.A relevant drawing for the device was reviewed during the investigation.During the investigation no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Device was not returned to customer quality (cq) for device evaluation, therefore, material assessment or dimensional inspection could not be performed.¿ conclusion: in conclusion, the complaint condition is confirmed as a broken elite h staple was observed in the provided medical images.During the investigation no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.No new malfunctions were observed during the course of this investigation.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|