| Model Number |
ZCT525 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The intraocular lens (iol) is not returning for evaluation as it is discarded; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, labeling, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that patient had unexpected post-op refraction after implant of a model zct525 tecnis toric iol (intraocular lens) in his right eye (od).Pre-op refraction: -7.75 -7.75 x 070; post-op refraction: -3.00 -4.75 x 045; ucva (uncorrected visual acuity): cfs (counting fingers); bcva (best corrected visual acuity): 20/200.Through follow-up, the lens was explanted and replaced with a model ar40e.The patient was seen on (b)(6) 2018.Vision was 2100 and patient can only count fingers.No additional information provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: based on new information, there were no patient injuries, but customer was not certain if incision enlargement was performed.The customer stated that the patient was last seen on (b)(6) 2018.They did an auto refract evaluation with a result of 2100.They did a post-op contact lens fitting and ordered post-graft rigid permeable gas (rpg) contact lenses for the patient.It was also noted that patient still has a quite of cylinder and has a scheduled appointment with the doctor in (b)(6).Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 10/2/2018.Device returned to manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the product was received in a lens case.The product is inspected by a qualified inspector using a microscope with a 12x magnification.It can seen dirt particles are present and the optic body is damaged on the posterior side, also it can be seen that the optic body is being cut in most probably to make explant possible.The complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and no deviation was found during process related to the complaint issue reported.There was no discrepancy found during the mrr (manufacturing record review).The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no similar complaints were received for this production order.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions for the proper use and handling of the product.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are nr-0148919 and capa-010215.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|