|
(b)(4).Information regarding patient age, gender, weight, race, ethnicity, and medical history were not provided.Procode is krd/hcg.(b)(4).Concomitant med products: detachment control box.Initial reporter information such as the name, phone and email address are unknown.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that during the coil embolization procedure of an abdominal aneurysm, the deltafill 18 16mm x 50cm coil (dlf181650 / l11869) was used and it prematurely detached during placement with 3 cm of the coil still outside of the aneurysm; the remaining 3 cm of the coil was pushed into the aneurysm and the procedure was completed.The coil was implanted.There was no further issue and there was no procedural delay associated with the reported issue.There was no report of patient injury or complication; the complaint product was new and was stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the instruction for use (ifu) with constant flush maintained at all time.There was no visible defect or damage noted on the product prior to the event.There was no unintended detachment observed in the vessel or in the microcatheter.The product is not available to be returned for evaluation.Based on complaint information, the device was not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (l11869) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the limited information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported customer complaint could not be confirmed.Based on the device history record review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.The exact cause of the event could not be conclusively determined; however, it is possible that circumstances of the procedure and/or device manipulation/interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective/preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|