|
|
| Catalog Number |
J397H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Impaired Healing (2378); Not Applicable (3189)
|
| Date of Event |
08/06/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The device history records were reviewed and the manufacturing criteria was met prior to the release of this lot.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The patient demographic info: age, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure what tissue type and location of the suture placement? what tissue split? did the tissue dehisce? what was the tissue condition, i.E., normal or thin, calcified, fragile, diseased? how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? how was the suture tied (square knot or multiple knots one end)? what was the appearance of the suture when it was removed? date suture was removed? was there any additional medical or surgical intervention after suture was removed? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications.What is physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient current status? an unopened sample of product code j397, lot # mb2379 was returned for analysis.The issue sample was not received for evaluation.During the visual inspection of unopened sample, no defects were found on the package.The sample was opened, and the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The suture was dispensed without problems and examined along of the strand and no defects, damage or suture breakage were observed.A functional test was performed and the tensile strength force was above the minimum requirement.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this batch.Per the condition of the representative sample, no breakage was found on the suture and the tested sample met the requirements.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent episiotomy on (b)(6) 2018 and suture was used.The suture broke 10 days after the procedure.It was reported that the patient¿s incision healing was bad, split.There was no swelling or pus.The surgeon removed the suture and did not re-suture.The patient underwent daily bath with potassium permanganate.It was reported that the patient healed.Additional information has been requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pc-(b)(4).Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: the patient demographic info: age, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure unk what tissue type and location of the suture placement? unk what tissue split? did the tissue dehisce? incision what was the tissue condition, i.E., normal or thin, calcified, fragile, diseased?unk how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)?unk how was the suture tied (square knot or multiple knots one end)?unk what was the appearance of the suture when it was removed? date suture was removed? august, 6th was there any additional medical or surgical intervention after suture was removed? daily bath with potassium permanganate other relevant patient history/concomitant medications unk what is physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? maybe suture what is the patient current status? stable permanganate and it healed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|