| Model Number |
3122-020 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
09/10/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Patient was revised to address tibial subsidence and loosening of the tibial component at the cement to implant interface.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Investigation summary no device associated with this report was received for examination.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4) used to capture the medical devise removal, no information available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medical records received on 05 november 2019 were reviewed to identify patient harms/product issues on 21 november 2019.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent total left knee arthroplasty due to degenerative joint disease.The patella was resurfaced.The surgeon reported no intraoperative complications.The patient was implanted with the attune knee system and smartset bone cement x 2.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent a left knee revision due to loosening of the tibial component.The surgeon reported the tibial component was grossly loose at the implant to cement interface, and easily removed with just finger pressure.He noted the femoral component was stable and not revised.The patellar component was not revised.The patient was implanted with attune knee system and depuy cement x 2.There were no complications reported with the procedure.Doi: (b)(6) 2015; dor: (b)(6) 2018; (lt knee).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary no device associated with this report was received for examination.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: b1 (product problem), b5, d10, g1, g2.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Corrected: d3, e1, e2, e3, h6 (impact code).E3 initial reporter occupation: lawyer.H6 impact code: removed the codes surgical intervention and medical device removal, and replaced with device revision or replacement (f1905).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent a primary left knee arthroplasty due to degenerative joint disease.Two depuy cement products were used during the operation.There were no indicated intra-operative complications.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent a left knee revision due to tibial tray migration and loosening at the cement to implant interface.All components with the exception of the patella component were revised.(b)(4), captures the right knee revision on (b)(6) 2017, due to loosening of an unknown component.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|