|
Additional narrative: the device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Part 399.62, lot t168808: release to warehouse date: september 03, 2018.Manufacture site: (b)(4).A review of the device history records showed that there were no issues at the time of manufacturing of this device and its sub components that would contribute to the complaint condition.The raw material certificate was reviewed and the used material was according to the specification of the device.No non-conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during the production of this device.Review of the device history record of (b)(4) showed that there were no issues at the time of manufacturing of this device that would contribute to the issue outlined in this complaint a product investigation was completed: upon visual inspection on the there is a fracture on the left corner on the distal tip of the device.The fragment piece was not returned.The balance of device is in good condition.The complaint condition is confirmed and the received condition agrees with the complaint description.The cause of the issue could not be definitively traced to use error, misuse/abuse, non-compliance, postoperative trauma.Dimensional inspection showed the device was conforming.A device history review, was performed for the returned instrument¿s lot number and no material review report (mrrs), non-conformance reports (ncrs) or complaint-related issues were identified with the lot number which may have contributed to the complaint condition.A review of the current design drawing was performed; no issues were identified.Based on the available information it is not possible to determine a definitive root cause for the complaint condition.The raw material certificate was reviewed, and the used material was according to the specification of the device.A definitive root cause for the given complaint condition could not be determined from the provided information.However, rough handling during transit or during sterilization may have led to the complaint condition.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|