|
The screw explanted after the revision surgery was returned to spinecraft and investigation was performed.Bench testing was conducted on several screws from or associated with the same components used in incident lot to challenge the assembly.All screws were able to withstand over 21 nm tightening torque of their set screws, which is double the set screw normal tightening torque, without disengagement of the screws heads (tulips).The usage history was also reviewed for this lot of the screws and this showed that no incident has been reported in regard to this lot or other lots using components associated with the same.Multiple representative lots of assembly components associated with the explanted screw were re-inspected and no deviations were found.A thorough review of the device history record was performed and no deviations or anomalies were identified.The tolerance analysis for design was also reviewed and no faults were found.The root cause of the reported failure cannot be determined at this time as there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported.We can presume however that load force exceeding the load capacity of the screw was probably encountered post-op, with the subsequent failure of the bottom ring.If additional information became available a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|