| Catalog Number |
03.010.049 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Align (2522)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
| Date of Event |
09/16/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Complainant device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Customer retaining for both devices.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Investigation summary: based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history lot: part: 03.010.049; lot: 1726585; manufacturing site: (b)(4).Release to warehouse date: 11 september 2007.The device history record shows this lot of (b)(4) pieces was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or non-conformities noted.This lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2018, a trocar antegrade locking arm was not lining up with the hole of the nail.It appears that there was a wiggle of the trocar protection sleeve in the aiming arm.The surgeon did a perfect circle through the proximal end of the nail.The surgery was delayed approximately 5-10 minutes.The surgery was successfully completed and the patient outcome is stable.Concomitant device reported: unknown trocar insertion handle connecting screws (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity # 1).This complaint involves two (2) devices.This complaint is for (1) aiming arm for antegrade standard locking.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Event description update in mwr-(b)(4) was a correction, not additional information.Date reported in mwr-(b)(4) was 9/26/2018.Correct date should have been 10/17/2018.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2018, a trocar antegrade locking arm was not lining up with the hole of the nail during a retrograde/antegrade femoral nail (rafn) procedure.The surgeon was able to insert the screw with the wrong trocar sleeve.It appears that there was a wiggle of the trocar protection sleeve in the aiming arm.The surgeon did a perfect circle through the proximal end of the nail.The surgery was delayed approximately 5-10 minutes.The surgery was successfully completed and the patient outcome is stable.Concomitant device: trocar insertion handle connecting screws (part unknown, lot unknown, quantity 1).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Initial reporter occupation: initial reporter is synthes sales consultant.Device evaluated by mfr: dhr review was completed.Part: 03.010.049; lot: 1726585.Manufacturing site: hägendorf.Release to warehouse date: 11 september 2007.The device history record shows this lot of (b)(4) pieces was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|