• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - HUNTINGTON ACRYSOF SINGLEPIECE IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - HUNTINGTON ACRYSOF SINGLEPIECE IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number SA60AT
Device Problem Defective Device (2588)
Patient Problems Edema (1820); Swelling (2091); Visual Impairment (2138)
Event Date 12/01/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A sample device was not returned for analysis.Complaint history and product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Root cause has not been identified.There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.Additional information has been requested.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A patient reported that three months following an intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, the lens was determined to be defective.The iol was removed four months following the initial procedure, but a replacement lens was not implanted.Approximately two and a half months later, a corneal specialist sewed in a replacement lens, followed by a dsek (descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty) corneal transplant three months after the replacement lens was implanted.The patient reported she sees a retina specialist for edema caused by multiple surgeries.She also stated that her vision has not returned to her pre-surgical level and has had to retire from her job due to insufficient vision.A follow up to the surgeon was performed who reported the patient had an extremely short eye (+10.00 hyperopic) preoperatively.Nine days postoperative, another physician in the group noted the patient had a pre-retinal membrane, but there was a question of a membrane irregularity on the posterior surface of the lens.The surgeon agreed with the physician and scheduled a procedure to either clear the backside of the iol , or perform an iol exchange.During the secondary procedure (4 months postoperative), the lens could not be polished or cleaned posteriorly, so it was removed from the patient's eye.There was not adequate support for a bag or sulcus lens after the iol removal, so the patient was left aphakic.The patient was referred to a corneal specialist who sewed in an iol seven months postoperative to the initial procedure.Three months later the patient had a corneal transplant due to corneal swelling.The patient is also under the care of a retina specialist for her pre-retinal membrane.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACRYSOF SINGLEPIECE IOL
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - HUNTINGTON
6065 kyle lane
huntington WV 25702
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - HUNTINGTON
6065 kyle lane
huntington WV 25702
Manufacturer Contact
bryan blake
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8176152230
MDR Report Key7942801
MDR Text Key123065891
Report Number1119421-2018-01448
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P930014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/08/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2021
Device Model NumberSA60AT
Device Catalogue NumberSA60AT.400
Device Lot Number12473660
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/11/2018
Initial Date FDA Received10/08/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/18/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
-
-