| Model Number |
04.111.731 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date of event reported as 2018.Exact date of device breakage is not known.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported patient was implanted with the variable angle locking compression plate (va lcp) two-column volar distal radius plate on (b)(6) 2018.On unknown date it was determined the plate was broken and patient had developed non-optimal fixation.Patient was returned to surgery on (b)(6) 2018 where the broken plate was removed.It is not known what additional hardware was implanted.This report is for one (1) va lcp two-column volar distal radius plate.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Concomitant devices: screw (part: unknown, lot: unknown, quantity: unknown).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Dhr review was completed.Part:04.111.731 , lot:l893362 , manufacturing site: mezzovico , release to warehouse date: 18.May 2018.The device history record shows this lot of 21pieces was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.The raw material certificate 60062495 with the lot no.L888545 was reviewed and the used material was according specification for implants for surgery.This implant was manufactured from 60010283 lot l829908 from hempel metals and more.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition customer quality conducted an investigation of the returned device.A broken va-lcp two-column distal radius plate was returned for investigation.Implant was forwarded to the manufacturing site and was checked for conformance to the specifications.The review of the device history record revealed that this implant was manufactured in may 2018 according to the specifications.The parts conformed to dimensional specifications at the time of manufacturing and passed inspection requirements with no non-conformities reported.As per selected investigation flow, a visual inspection has been performed and it confirmed that the received condition agrees with the complaint condition but no visual defects manufacturing related have been identified on returned item.The dimensional re-inspection, the raw material certificate review and the document/specification review didn¿t identify any manufacturing defect or deficiency, thus the complaint investigation is considered as not manufacturing related.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|