| Catalog Number |
03.702.215S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Reporter is synthes sales consultant.A review of the device history records has been requested.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on an unknown date, the tip (¿nose¿) of the syringes broke off.It is unknown if there were patient and procedure involvement.This report is for one (1) vertecem v+ syringe kit.This is report 2 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on an unknown date during an unknown procedure, the tip (¿nose¿) of the syringes broke off.It is unknown if there was a surgical delay.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device history lot part: 03.702.215s, lot: 8052501, manufacturing site: (b)(4), supplier: (b)(4), release to warehouse date: 12.June 2018, expiry date: 01.May 2023.The device history record shows this lot was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|