BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS POWERPORT MRI ISP, 8 FR GROSHONG, INTER. W SUTURE PLUG, S/L; IMPLANTABLE PORT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 1808560 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problems
Erythema (1840); Pain (1994); Skin Discoloration (2074); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.Medical records were not provided.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the port catheter allegedly broke.It was further reported that the port catheter was removed and replaced by another port device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation.Four x-ray images were provided for review.Based on the image review, a catheter separation at the proximal segment near the port was confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported catheter break.The root cause could not be determined based upon available information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural factors contributed to the event.Potential contributing factors include over-pressurization, pinch off, chemical degradation and flexural fatigue.Labeling review: the review of the ifu (instructions for use), indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the port catheter allegedly broke.It was further reported that the port catheter was removed and replaced by another port device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the port catheter allegedly broke.It was further reported that the port catheter was removed and replaced by another port device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Labeling review: the review of the ifu (instructions for use), indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation.Four x-ray images were provided for review.Based on the image review, a catheter separation at the proximal segment near the port was confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported catheter break.The root cause could not be determined based upon available information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural factors contributed to the event.Potential contributing factors include over-pressurization, pinch off, chemical degradation and flexural fatigue.H10: g4 h11: h6 (patient, method) h11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|