|
At this time no conclusions can be made.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Information is limited at this time.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Not returned.
|
|
The following was information was reported by the patient attorney.The information included limited patient medical records: per medical records: (b)(6) 2014 - the patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia and underwent a laparoscopic repair with implant of a bard/davol 3dmax mesh.Per the implant operative report details, "preperitoneal space was opened widely and massive indirect sac was encountered.It was carefully dissected free and reduced.The 3dmax mesh was placed across the groin and tacked in place using a non-bard/davol tacking device." per attorney for patient: (b)(6) 2018 - the patient underwent a revision surgery which included explant of the bard/davol 3dmax mesh.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2014 ¿ patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of 3dmax mesh.Per op notes, ¿an indirect sac was encountered.The 3dmax mesh was placed across the groin and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2018 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia; incarcerated ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, ¿recurrent indirect inguinal hernia were dissected away.A synthetic mesh was placed over the floor of inguinal canal and sutured.In mid abdomen, hernia was dissected down and incarcerated fat was reduced.The fascial defect was closed using sutures.¿.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: b4, b5, b7, d3, d4 (udi no.), e3, g1, g3, g6, h2, h6, h10, h11.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|