It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the femoral head was removed.The bhr cup remained implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.The available medical documents were reviewed.This 65-year-old female with a bmi= 36.1 and many co-morbid conditions, had her primary bhr resurfacing hip performed in november 2010.It was revised 19 days later secondary to multiple dislocations.The root cause for the first revision cannot be concluded.It is unknown if the patient¿s body habitus and early weight bearing contributed to the dislocations and subsequent revision.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Further, it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.Additional information: event, brand name, concomitant medical products and pma/510k.
|