| Model Number |
RSW271A30 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Skin Irritation (2076); Skin Tears (2516)
|
| Date of Event |
09/19/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Retained samples of the same lot have been inspected visually and mechanically.Mechanical tests were performed on 4 retained samples.All tested samples were found to perform within limits.No faults were detected.The involved device has not been made available to us.The initial report stated " no product will be returned.Sales rep had photos of issue." pictures of the injury had been provided and showed a skin irritation at the adhesive foam area around the gel area.Near to one corner of the electrode a first layer skin removal is visible.Based on the provided information it is unclear whether the skin injury had to be treated and if a skin preparation was performed.It is also unclear if the patient had any skin diseases or was taking any skin damaging medicines.We will provide any information in a follow up report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2018 a gynecological procedure was performed at (b)(6) hospital (b)(6).A monitoring dispersive electrode (model rs271a30) and a rem equipped covidien force triad generator were used.The initial report stated "that during a vaginal biopsy, after the procedure was completed, the or tech had to use two hands to remove the patient return pad from the upper right lateral leg of the patient, and noticed there was first layer skin removal, redness and irritation when the pad was removed.The doctor had used a covidien force triad generator, set to 30 watts cut and coag, during the procedure and activated the generator two or three times.It was not reported how the redness and irritation was treated.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Retained samples of the same lot have been inspected visually and mechanically.Mechanical tests were performed on 4 retained samples.All tested samples were found to perform within limits.No faults were detected.The involved device has not been made available to us.The initial report stated " no product will be returned.Sales rep had photos of issue." pictures of the injury had been provided and showed a skin irritation at the adhesive foam area around the gel area.Near to one corner of the electrode a first layer skin removal is visible.The ifu explicitly states: "after use remove the electrode gently with one hand and support the underlying tissue with the other.Lift the electrode at one corner of its base, not by the diathermy cable, and peel it off slowly.Tugging, pulling or rapid removal may cause skin trauma." the initial report stated the or tech had to use two hands to remove the patient return pad (.)".It is unclear whether the underlying tissue has been supported with one hand as instructed in the ifu.As no information about the general state of the patient's skin, preexisting medical conditions and whether any medication had been taken by the patient, which could have weakened the skin, was provided despite of repeated requests, no further conclusion can be drawn.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6)2018 a gynaecological procedure was performed at bsa hospital llc, texas.A monitoring dispersive electrode (model rs271a30) and a rem equipped covidien force triad generator were used.The initial report stated "that during a vaginal biopsy, after the procedure was completed, the or tech had to use two hands to remove the patient return pad from the upper right lateral leg of the patient, and noticed there was first layer skin removal, redness and irritation when the pad was removed.The doctor had used a covidien force triad generator, set to 30 watts cut and coag, during the procedure and activated the generator two or three times." we have further been informed that "it was not reported how the redness and irritation was treated".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|