MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

Model Number 9600TFX26

Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Incomplete Coaptation (2507); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)

Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Mitral Regurgitation (1964); Regurgitation (2259)

Event Date 05/06/2017

Event Type  Injury  

Manufacturer Narrative

Investigation is underway.

Event Description

As reported from the tct 2018 presentation: ¿tavr valve in valve, valve in ring, valve in mac and valve in bicuspid as.Case #7: a case of tavr vir with complications¿.A case of a (b)(6) year-old female patient with previous mitral valve annuloplasty and tricuspid valve annuloplasty.After echocardiographic assessment a transcatheter mitral valve in ring procedure with a 26 mm sapien 3 valve by ts approach was performed.During the implant of the valve a severe lateral paravalvular leak with severe central intra-prosthetic mitral regurgitation and an immobile leaflet were noticed, therefore, a post dilatation and a valve-in-valve with second sapien 26 mm valve were performed.

Manufacturer Narrative

Central regurgitation is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.There are multiple patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to central regurgitation including malposition of the valve, impingement of a leaflet due to the guide wire, over inflation of the deployment balloon, post dilation of the implanted valve, and slow recovery of adequate ventricular flow post valve deployment and rapid pacing.All of these factors have the potential to contribute to suboptimal coaptation of the sapien valve leaflets and cause central aortic insufficiency.Occasionally there are cases where the root cause of the regurgitation cannot be determined.  paravalvular leak (pvl) is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.The patient screening manual and the procedure didactic identify several procedural and anatomical factors which could contribute to pvl, including device malposition, inaccurate measurement of the native valve annulus, uneven distribution of calcium on the native valve, bulky or severe calcification, an elliptical annulus shape and valve under-sizing.During the procedure there are several potential patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to a report of a restricted or non-functioning leaflet.Based on historical review of complaints, these events are typically a result of too ventricular deployment of the valve in combination with native leaflet overhang.Other potential contributing factors include: leaflet impingement in a highly calcified native valve, impingement of a leaflet due to the guide wire, or slow recovery of adequate ventricular flow post valve deployment and rapid pacing.This can result in a temporary decrease in the pressure gradient between the ventricle and the aorta, resulting in an inadequate pressure change to close the leaflets.In many instances this can be overcome with trouble shooting, which includes blood pressure recovery or support.Occasionally there are cases where the root cause of the non-functioning leaflet cannot be determined.During the manufacturing process, all edwards valves are 100% visually inspected for defects and 100% tested for coaptation prior to release for distribution.This makes it highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect or device malfunction would contribute to the event.  the edwards sapien 3 transcatheter heart valve, model 9600tfx, and accessories are indicated for patients with symptomatic heart disease due to failure (stenosed, insufficient, or combined) of a surgical bioprosthetic aortic or mitral valve who are judged by a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, to be at high or greater risk for open surgical therapy (i.E., predicted risk of surgical mortality = 8% at 30 days, based on the sts risk score and other clinical co-morbidities unmeasured by the sts risk calculator).In this case, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event. the cause of the reported events is unknown as information was not forthcoming. the ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.

Manufacturer Narrative

Central regurgitation is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.There are multiple patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to central regurgitation including malposition of the valve, impingement of a leaflet due to the guide wire, over inflation of the deployment balloon, post dilation of the implanted valve, and slow recovery of adequate ventricular flow post valve deployment and rapid pacing.All of these factors have the potential to contribute to suboptimal coaptation of the sapien valve leaflets and cause central aortic insufficiency.Occasionally there are cases where the root cause of the regurgitation cannot be determined.  paravalvular leak (pvl) is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.The patient screening manual and the procedure didactic identify several procedural and anatomical factors which could contribute to pvl, including device malposition, inaccurate measurement of the native valve annulus, uneven distribution of calcium on the native valve, bulky or severe calcification, an elliptical annulus shape and valve under-sizing.During the procedure there are several potential patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to a report of a restricted or non-functioning leaflet.Based on historical review of complaints, these events are typically a result of too ventricular deployment of the valve in combination with native leaflet overhang.Other potential contributing factors include: leaflet impingement in a highly calcified native valve, impingement of a leaflet due to the guide wire, or slow recovery of adequate ventricular flow post valve deployment and rapid pacing.This can result in a temporary decrease in the pressure gradient between the ventricle and the aorta, resulting in an inadequate pressure change to close the leaflets.In many instances this can be overcome with trouble shooting, which includes blood pressure recovery or support.Occasionally there are cases where the root cause of the non-functioning leaflet cannot be determined.During the manufacturing process, all edwards valves are 100% visually inspected for defects and 100% tested for coaptation prior to release for distribution.This makes it highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect or device malfunction would contribute to the event.  the edwards sapien 3 transcatheter heart valve, model 9600tfx, and accessories are indicated for patients with symptomatic heart disease due to failure (stenosed, insufficient, or combined) of a surgical bioprosthetic aortic or mitral valve who are judged by a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, to be at high or greater risk for open surgical therapy (i.E., predicted risk of surgical mortality = 8% at 30 days, based on the sts risk score and other clinical co-morbidities unmeasured by the sts risk calculator).In this case, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event. the cause of the reported events is unknown as information was not forthcoming. the ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.

Manufacturer Narrative

Corrected data: f10, h6.Reference capa-20-00141.

• Brand Name: EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
• Type of Device: PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
• Manufacturer (Section D): EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; 1 edwards way; irvine CA 92614
• MDR Report Key: 7982056
• MDR Text Key: 124320206
• Report Number: 2015691-2018-04277
• Device Sequence Number: 1
• Product Code: NPU
• Combination Product (y/n): N
• PMA/PMN Number: P140031
• Number of Events Reported: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Report Source: Manufacturer
• Source Type: company representative,foreig
• Remedial Action: Other
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup
• Report Date: 09/27/2018

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Date FDA Received: 10/18/2018
• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Device Operator: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: 9600TFX26
• Device Catalogue Number: N/A
• Device Lot Number: N/A
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Date Manufacturer Received: 07/23/2020
• Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device?: No
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Outcome(s): Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 55 YR