| Catalog Number |
3548314 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A device history record review is in progress.Once completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent breast reconstruction revision with a mentor cpx 4 550cc breast tissue expander.Deflation on the left breast tissue expander was observed post procedure.The physician states there was a hole within the seam of the expander.As a result, the patient underwent removal and replacement with a similar mentor cpx 4 550cc breast tissue expander on (b)(6) 2018.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation summary: the device was received at mentor with white fluid.The device appeared intact.Because the authorization for return and examination of medical device form was not signed and/or returned to mentor, analysis lab was precluded from further evaluating the device.No anomalies were observed.Complaint was not confirmed.Mentor products are 100% visually inspected prior to release in addition to thorough in-process testing during several stages of the manufacturing process.A root cause failure analysis will not be conducted since the investigation of the reported failure could not confirm that an actual failure of the device to conform to expected performance had occurred.The device history record (dhr) for the lot number 7395601 has been reviewed and it was verified that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specifications and procedures.Initial allegation indicates the tissue expander had deflated.The device appeared intact.Because the risk of device deflation cannot be eliminated, mentor addresses this risk in the pids by stating that these devices should not be considered lifetime devices.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation on (b)(6) 2018.The analysis has begun, but is not complete at this time.When the investigation and analysis have been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed on (b)(6) 2018, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|