|
It was reported, during preparation for an aortic runoff procedure, the advance 14 lp low profile balloon catheter material was noted to be frayed and crimped upon removal from the packaging.It was not nicely wrapped.The device did not make patient contact.The procedure was successfully completed with another device of the same type.No patient adverse effect has been reported.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation evaluation.A review of the dimensional verification, complaint history, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufactures instructions, quality control, specifications, and a visual inspection of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.The visual inspection of the returned device confirmed that the balloon was unused and presented with three major frays.Physical and fluorescent testing confirmed the presence of hydrophilic coating on the appropriate areas of the device.This also confirmed that the frays were of the hydrophilic coating.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.However, while reviewing the subassembly lot there were two nonconformances noted.The first was for tip damage, and the second for damage of the wire lumen.Both affected units were scrapped and not replaced prior to order completion.It should also be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Furthermore, a review of the manufactures instructions and quality control procedures was conducted, and no gaps were discovered.However, retraining of appropriate personnel was requested.Retraining was not completed as the employee no longer works in the department and will not be returning.Based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could be traced to a manufacturing and quality control deficiency.We will continue our monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Measures are being conducted to address this failure mode.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|