|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a hole in the catheter was confirmed and the cause appeared to be use-related.The product returned for evaluation was one 4fr s/l poly per-q-cath catheter.The sample was untrimmed and appeared free of usage residues.The catheter was received with an inlaid stylet with t-lock assembly.A split was observed in the t-lock assembly extension tubing.Microscopic inspection of the split revealed irregular edges.The split edges exhibited irregular and striated fracture surfaces.The split was v-shaped and impressions were observed leading into the split site.The fracture features were consistent with damage caused by contact between the extension tubing and a traumatic instrument.The split shape and impressions was suggestive of the tubing being pinched by a grasping instrument.The product ifu states ¿avoid accidental device contact with sharp instruments and mechanical damage to the catheter material.Use only smooth-edged atraumatic clamps or forceps.¿ a lot history review (lhr) of recp1673 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|