| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Deflation Problem (1149)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
10/15/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The actual device has been returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.A review of the device history record of the product code/lot# combination was conducted with no findings.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The user facility reported that the solopath was used for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa) procedure.The solopath was placed in the left groin through a cut down access.It expanded successfully and the appropriate therapeutic devices were advanced through the sheath.When it was time to collapse the solopath, the physician attached an inflation device to the collapsible port and started to inflate to 6atm.The physician noticed it was taking some time to get to 6atm.The physician ended up using fluoroscopy and noticed a pooling of contrast.The physician was able to remove the solopath without problem and believed the cause of the collapsible balloon was due to the plaque/calcium of the artery.The procedure was completed successfully.The patient was reported to be in stable condition.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to update and to provide the completed investigation.One 19fr solopath device was received for product analysis.The 25 cm sheath was returned separated from the balloon dilator.Visual inspection revealed that the balloon dilator was returned in a curved configuration.There were no other gross visual anomalies noted with the balloon dilator.Under visual examination, the sheath appeared collapsed.No gross anomalies were noted.An inflation device filled with water was attached to the sheath re-collapsing port.As water was injected into the outer jacket, a leak was measured approximately 2.4990" from the distal tip.Microscopy revealed the section in the outer jacket where a small pin hole was present.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.Based on the investigation results, the physician stating he believed the cause was the plaque/calcium present in the artery, and past complaint history; it is likely that reported damage could have resulted from difficult anatomical conditions such as calcium depositions or previous stents in the artery.However, the exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|