| Model Number |
TRUETRACK |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
High Test Results (2457)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
10/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The device is undergoing an evaluation but has not yet been completed.Test strip udi# (b)(4).Manufacturer contacted customer on (b)(6) 2018 in a follow-up call to ensure that the replacement products resolved the initial concern; customer stated that the replacement product is working to their satisfaction and they have not had any medical intervention or symptoms since the last call.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Consumer reported complaint for high and erratic blood glucose test results.The customer is concerned with tests results from results obtained of 228, 353 and 279 mg/dl.The customer's expected fasting blood glucose test result range is 160 - 200 mg/dl.Customer was not using correct testing technique for the back to back tests.The customer feels well and did not report any symptoms.Medical attention is not reported as a result of the actual blood glucose results.During the call on (b)(6) 2018, a back to back blood test was not performed by customer.The product is stored according to specification in the bedroom.The test strip lot manufacturer's expiration date is 05/31/2020 and open vial date is two weeks.The meter memory was reviewed for previous test result history (date/time not set; results of 388 and 298 mg/dl are not customer's results, they are her husband's results): result 1:228mg/dl (b)(6) 8:09am fasting; result 2:353mg.Dl (b)(6) 8:05am fasting; result 3:279mg/dl (b)(6) 8:04am fasting; result 4:388mg/dl not customer's result, this is her husband's result; result 5:298mg/dl not customer's result, this is her husband's result; result 6:182mg/dl (b)(6) 6:52am fasting; result 7:134mg/dl (b)(6) 2:25pm fasting.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Consumer reported complaint for high and erratic blood glucose test results.The customer is concerned with tests results from results obtained of 228, 353 and 279 mg/dl.The customer's expected fasting blood glucose test result range is 160 - 200 mg/dl.Customer was not using correct testing technique for the back to back tests.The customer feels well and did not report any symptoms.Medical attention is not reported as a result of the actual blood glucose results.During the call on (b)(6) 2018, a back to back blood test was not performed by customer.The product is stored according to specification in the bedroom.The test strip lot manufacturer's expiration date is 05/31/2020 and open vial date is two weeks.The meter memory was reviewed for previous test result history (date/time not set; results of 388 and 298 mg/dl are not customer's results, they are her husband's results): (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Returned meter evaluated with no defect found.Test strips not returned for evaluation.Most likely underlying root cause: mlc-58-user had an inaccurate reference: self: the person is using themselves as the reference or how they feel at the time they run the blood test.(b)(4).Note: manufacturer contacted customer on 10/16/2018 in a follow-up call to ensure that the replacement products resolved the initial concern; customer stated that the replacement product is working to their satisfaction and they have not had any medical intervention or symptoms since the last call.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Consumer reported complaint for high and erratic blood glucose test results.The customer is concerned with tests results from results obtained of 228, 353 and 279 mg/dl.The customer's expected fasting blood glucose test result range is 160 - 200 mg/dl.Customer was not using correct testing technique for the back to back tests.The customer feels well and did not report any symptoms.Medical attention is not reported as a result of the actual blood glucose results.During the call on 10/01/2018, a back to back blood test was not performed by customer.The product is stored according to specification in the bedroom.The test strip lot manufacturer's expiration date is 05/31/2020 and open vial date is two weeks.The meter memory was reviewed for previous test result history (date/time not set; results of 388 and 298 mg/dl are not customer's results, they are her husband's results): result 1:228mg/dl, 3/22 8:09am, fasting; result 2:353mg.Dl, 3/22 8:05am, fasting; result 3:279mg/dl, 3/22 8:04am, fasting; result 4:388mg/dl, not customer's result, this is her husband's result; result 5:298mg/dl, not customer's result, this is her husband's result; result 6:182mg/dl, 3/18 6:52am, fasting; result 7:134mg/dl, 3/17 2:25pm, fasting.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(manufacturer narrative = t, corrected data = t) internal report #: (b)(4) returned meter evaluated with no defect found.Test strips not returned for evaluation.Most likely underlying root cause: mlc-58-user had an inaccurate reference: self: the person is using themselves as the reference or how they feel at the time they run the blood test.Test strip udi#: (b)(4).Note: manufacturer contacted customer on 10/16/2018 in a follow-up call to ensure that the replacement products resolved the initial concern; customer stated that the replacement product is working to their satisfaction and they have not had any medical intervention or symptoms since the last call.Correction: correct the evaluation codes on section h reflecting the device evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|