• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. HAKIM PROG VALVE INLINE SIPHONGUARD; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. HAKIM PROG VALVE INLINE SIPHONGUARD; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82-3842
Device Problem Obstruction of Flow (2423)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction (1982)
Event Date 10/04/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has been returned for evaluation.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the affiliate that the hakim valve and catheter contained a blockage.A revision took place and during the revision, the shunt flow was confirmed.The valve was implanted in a v-p application for treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus (nph).Initial setting were unknown.The patient had been under monitoring and no defect was confirmed.Then difficulty with walking and cognitive dysfunction were confirmed on the patient and she visited the hospital.Ventricular enlargement was diagnosed by imagining check-up and the valve setting was changed from 160 mmh2o to 80mmh2o.However ventricular contraction was not confirmed.By the angiography, the contrast media flow on the ventricle side, however, the contrast media flow from the shunt to the distal was not confirmed.The surgeon suspected that the distal of the catheter was blocked, therefore, revision of the abdominal catheter was performed.It was confirmed that there was some white material in the explanted catheter that could have blocked the flow.Also, the drops from the shunt system was confirmed.There was no contamination of blood or debris in the cerebrospinal fluid confirmed.No change of the patient confirmed.The ultra x ray of the shunt was done due to suspicious catheter blockage.The setting of the shunt was 80 mmh2o at revision.The patient is under monitoring now, but ventricular contraction is not confirmed yet.The surgeon is planning to lower the setting even more.There was no surgical delay and there was no adverse consequence to the patient.No further information was provided by hospital.The products will be returned to your site.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Two pieces of catheter were returned for evaluation.Tone is 9cm long, and the other is 3cm long.The 2 pieces of catheter were irrigated, no occlusions noted or leaks were noted.A review of the history device records was not possible as the lot number was unknown.No root cause could be determined, as no occlusion was found.Based on the results of the investigation, the reported issue could not be confirmed.The device functioned as intended.Trends will be monitored for this and similar issues.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HAKIM PROG VALVE INLINE SIPHONGUARD
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC.
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key8010558
MDR Text Key125185395
Report Number1226348-2018-10761
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K992173
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number82-3842
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/18/2018
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/04/2018
Initial Date FDA Received10/26/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/03/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/06/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age84 YR
-
-