• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9004
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Reocclusion (1985)
Date of Event 07/23/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The sample was not returned from the user facility; therefore, a device evaluation is unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed there is no similar reocclusion complaints associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual sample was not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.The investigator assessed the event was not related to the study device or procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided with all relevant information.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through a post market clinical study that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the left popliteal artery.Approximately 4 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s left popliteal artery was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the health care professional (hcp) deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed that the event was not related to the study device or to the procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and is not available for evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through a post market clinical study that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the left popliteal artery.Approximately 4 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s left popliteal artery was reportedly reoccluded via duplex ultrasound (dus) imaging.A revascularization involving a cutting/scoring balloon and placement of a bare metal stent was performed.The health care professional (hcp) deemed the revascularization was successful.The investigator assessed that the event was not related to the study device or to the procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and is not available for evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The event description had the following information added ".Via duplex ultrasound (dus) imaging.A revascularization involving a cutting/scoring balloon and placement of a bare metal stent was performed.The health care professional (hcp) deemed the revascularization was successful." the relevant tests and lab data had the following information added "on (b)(6) 2018, dus imaging indicated target lesion was 90% reoccluded.The patients had a resting abi = 0.64 in left leg and a rutherford class assessment of v in left leg.A reintervention involving a cutting/scoring balloon and placement of a bare metal stent was performed." the complainant occupation - other was updated with "cardiovascular internal medicine" corrected data: the mdr contact person and email address were changed to (b)(6).The mdr contact phone number was changed to (b)(6).H3 analysis: the sample was not returned from the user facility; therefore, a device evaluation is unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed there is no similar reocclusion complaints associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual sample was not returned for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.The investigator assessed the event was not related to the study device or procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided with all relevant information.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Common Device Name
DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
MDR Report Key8012027
Report Number3006513822-2018-00243
Device Sequence Number1464496
Product Code ONU
UDI-Device Identifier00801741123245
UDI-Public(01)00801741123245
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
P130024
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source distributor,foreign,health pr
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/02/2020
Device Model Number9004
Device Catalogue NumberLX3513051505F
Device Lot NumberGFBS0525
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/05/2018
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/21/2019
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/28/2018
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/26/2019
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient Weight65
-
-