| Catalog Number |
219357 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
10/05/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.(b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the sales rep via phone that during an acl reconstruction procedure the sales rep's restore 7mm femoral aimer offset tip broke off in the patient.The sales rep stated that the device broke while the surgeon was flexing the knee for drilling.The tip of the device was removed from the patient with no debris left behind.The case was completed with another like-device with no patient harm, but a five minute delay to remove the tip of the device.The sales rep stated there was no need for future surgical intervention.The device is being returned for evaluation.There was patient involvement reported.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observation confirms the distal tip is broken.Hence, the complaint is confirmed.This device is made of stainless steel and it is possible that the tip broke off during application of excessive force while using the device.The root cause behind the failure is not determined.A device history record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident; therefore, there is no evidence of manufacturing anomalies on the paperwork reviewed.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|