• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0835
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Advance (2524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 09/26/2017
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly and had offset coil winds.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed that the device was functional.The ruby coil was re-sheathed and advanced through a demonstration microcatheter and out of the distal tip without an issue.Further evaluation of the returned device revealed that the embolization coil winds were offset.The root cause of this damage could not be determined.The non-penumbra microcatheter identified in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.The offset coil winds may have contributed to the inability to re-sheath the ruby coil during the procedure.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the ovarian vein using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician attempted to advance a ruby coil through another manufacturer¿s microcatheter two times and experienced resistance.Therefore, the ruby coil was removed.It was also reported that difficulty was experienced re-sheathing the ruby coil.The procedure was completed using another ruby coil and the same microcatheter.There was no adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key8030350
Report Number3005168196-2018-02156
Device Sequence Number16490605
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013206
UDI-Public00814548013206
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateGA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K120330
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 10/02/2018
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/09/2025
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0835
Device Lot NumberF73687
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/08/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/02/2018
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/01/2018
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-