|
An event regarding wear involving a ceramic head was reported.The event was confirmed by mar.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 16 aug 2018.Images of the device are included in the mar.{.} the returned device is shown in figures 1 and 2.The parts were examined with the aid of a stereo microscope at magnifications up to 50x.{.} {.} the articulating surface of the head is shown in figures 5 and 6, with a wear scar being observed.The wear scar is likely due to contact against a ceramic surface.{.} the material analysis report concluded: {.} based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.{.} medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant confirmed stem fracture; however, did not reference the ceramic head wear observed during mar.Device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information, including operative reports, surgical implant records from the surgeries, dated pre and post op x-rays/ imaging from the index and revision surgeries and outpatient office/clinic notes are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available, this investigation will be re-opened.
|