MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVASCULAR PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Infarction, Cerebral (1771); Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
|
Event Date 07/07/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Bhogal, p., chudyk, j., bleise, c., lylyk, i., perez, n., henkes, h., <(>&<)> lylyk, p.(2018).The use of flow diversion in vessels =2.5 mm in diameter¿a single-center experience.World neurosurgery, 118.Doi:10.1016/j.Wneu.2018.06.245 the pipeline devices will not be returned for evaluation as they remain implanted in the patients.Based on the provided information, there does not appear to have been any defect of the devices during use.The events occurred in the patients post-procedure and the causes could not be conclusively determined from the provided information.Mdrs related to this article: 2029214-2018-00933, 2029214-2018-00934.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic literature review found reports of post-procedure complications after pipeline implantation.The purpose of this article was to review the use of flow diversion on vessels less than or equal to 2.5mm in diameter.The authors retrospectively reviewed patient data and identified 29 patients (22 female, 7 male) with an average age of 56 years who underwent flow diversion treatment of aneurysms.The article notes the following outcomes of pipeline patients: - patient 3 ((b)(6) female) underwent placement of a pipeline 3x16 in the treatment of a saccular aneurysm in the left a1-a2.The patient experienced a frontal lobe hemorrhage.The patient did not require decompressive craniotomy and made a good recovery.- patient 5 ((b)(6) female) underwent placement of a pipeline 3x20 in the treatment of a fusiform aneurysm in the right p2-p3.Sometime post-procedure, the patient underwent retreatment in which additional flow diverters were placed in a telescoping manner.- patient 6 ((b)(6), female) underwent placement of a pipeline 3x16 in the treatment of a fusiform aneurysm in the left p2-p3.Sometime post-procedure, small infarction was seen on follow-up imaging; the patient made a good recovery and had an mrs of 0 at 90 days.In addition, the patient underwent retreatment sometime post-procedure in which additional flow diverters were placed in a telescoping manner.- patient 11 ((b)(6), female) underwent placement of two pipeline devices (3x18, 3.25x18) in the treatment of a fusiform aneurysm in the right mca bifurcation.Sometime post-procedure, small infarction was seen on follow-up imaging; the patient made a good recovery and had an mrs of 0 at 90 days.In addition, the patient underwent retreatment sometime post-procedure in which additional flow diverters were placed in a telescoping manner.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|