|
(b)(4).Single reporter exemption #e2015028.The guide wire and its separated distal fragment were returned for evaluation.The guide wire had its coil wire and polymer jacket fractured and elongated originating from the proximal solder.Approximately 135mm distal to the proximal solder, the exposed core wire was found fractured.The distal segment of the fragment was deformed and bent.A ball tip remained attached at the very distal end of the fragment.Proximal and distal fracture ends were microscopically observed.On the proximal fracture end, the core wire was found three-dimensionally bent.The proximal fracture end of the coil wire was found necked; this indicated that the coil wire fracture was due to tensile stress.To observe the distal fracture end, the polymer jacket was dissolved and the core wire was exposed.The exposed core wire was found fractured proximal to the mid solder.The fracture end was bent.Necking of the fracture end of the coil wire was also observed on the distal side.Measurement of the core wire length suggested that the full length of the guide wire was returned.Lot history review revealed no anomaly relating to the reported event.No other similar product experience report was received for this lot.Reviewing of production records found no indication of product deficiency.Based on the obtained information and investigation outcome, it was presumed that repeated bending stress that was generated with wire manipulation in attempt to cross the heavily tortuous, heavily calcified lesion contributed to the core wire fracture.When the bending stress exceeded the product's design limit, it caused the core wire to fracture.Wire removal was attempted when the guide wire was stuck inside the concomitant balloon catheter due to the anatomy.Pulling stress generated with wire removal was assumed to lead the coil wire and the polymer jacket to elongate and eventually fracture.Although there were reportedly no adverse patient effects, damage of the polymer jacket was too severe to completely rule out a possibility that some fragments might be left in the patient anatomy; therefore, it was concluded this event was reportable as serious injury.Instructions for use (ifu) states: [warnings] never push, auger, withdraw, or torque this guide wire that meets resistance.Torquing or pushing this guide wire against resistance may cause damage and/or tip separation of this guide wire or direct damage to a vessel.Resistance may be felt and/or observed under fluoroscopy by noting any buckling of the guide wire.If the prolapse of the guide wire tip is observed, do not allow the tip to remain in a prolapsed position; otherwise damage to the guide wire may occur.Determine the cause of resistance under fluoroscopy and take any necessary remedial action; [warnings] if resistance is felt between this guide wire and the other interventional devices while operating this guide wire in the blood vessel, avoid applying excessive force.When abnormal resistance is felt, remove the entire system from the patient's body and determine the cause.Otherwise, the guide wire may break or be damaged and may cause injury to the blood vessel or leave fragments inside the vessel; and, [malfunction and adverse effects] abrasion of the guide wire coating, separation or breakage of the guide wire.
|